● IndependentLicences verified at sourceNo paid placements in rankings
The Broker Bench
Global Edition
Bench IndexReviews42Prop firms6Pages published95Registers checked2Paid placements in rankings0
Broker review

Apex Trader Funding review

The largest futures prop firm by review count, rebuilt on 1 March 2026 with a new rule set and legacy accounts left deliberately untouched. Its headline promises hold up better than most, with two exceptions worth knowing before you buy: the consistency rule it says it removed applies to the funded account rather than the evaluation, and every funded account is capped at six payout requests.

Verdictcaution
Regulatorsnot verified
Founded2022
Minimum deposit$16.70 (25K evaluation, with the standing coupon)
PlatformsRithmic, Tradovate, Wealthcharts
Accepts100+ countries, restricted list published

On 1 March 2026 Apex Trader Funding replaced its entire product line and did something the rest of this sector mostly does not: it left every existing account alone. Its own help pages say legacy evaluations and funded accounts face “no rules or program changes” and “no retroactive changes,” and that traders may hold a mix of old and new.

That sentence is worth pausing on. Four weeks earlier, a competitor called FundingTicks rewrote the rules of challenges its customers had already bought, applied the change backwards, invalidated completed trades, and wound down a month later. Apex, running the same kind of migration, wrote the opposite promise into its documentation. Whatever else follows, that is the right way to change a product.

What you are buying

The new line splits by drawdown type: End of Day or Intraday Trailing. Take the 25K Intraday evaluation as the reference, since it is the volume seller.

Evaluation Funded account
Profit target $1,500 n/a
Max drawdown $1,000 $1,000
Minimum days to pass 1 n/a
Max contracts 4 mini / 40 micro 2 mini / 20 micro
Payout frequency n/a every 5 trading days
Payout split n/a none, trader keeps 100%
Consistency rule none 50%
Daily loss limit n/a yes
Max payout requests n/a 6

Activation of the funded account costs a one-time $69, due within 7 days of passing. Evaluations run 30 days, carry no resets, and bill once rather than monthly. Platforms are Rithmic, Tradovate and Wealthcharts. Up to 20 accounts can run at once.

The consistency rule moved, it did not disappear

The homepage bullet list reads “NO Eval consistency rules.” Four bullets later, in the same list of headline features, sits “50% Consistency.”

Both are accurate and they describe different stages. There is no consistency requirement while you are passing the evaluation. There is a 50% consistency rule on the funded account, meaning your best trading day may not exceed half of your total profit.

That is the stage where it costs money. A trader who makes $2,000 across a month, $1,400 of it on one strong day, has a compliant month by most people’s intuition and a non-compliant one by this rule. The fix is to keep trading until the total grows enough to make the big day proportionally smaller, which is a real constraint on how you take profit, not a formality.

Read it before you buy rather than after your first good day. Apex publishes a consistency calculator and violation alerts in the members area, which is more support than most firms give on this, and the rule is documented rather than hidden. It is simply not what the top of the page implies.

Six payouts, then what

The funded account specification lists Max Payout Requests: 6.

Sitting under an “unlimited” tone of voice, a hard cap of six payout requests per account is the kind of number that decides whether a plan works. Combined with a payout every 5 trading days, it defines a finite life for each funded account before you need a new one, and new ones are what the firm sells.

This is disclosed, it is in the table on the product page, and Apex does not hide it. Almost no review of this firm mentions it.

The 90% coupon is the price

The banner on 6 August 2026: “Any Size Evals up to 90% Off, use code SAVENOW,” beside a countdown clock reading six days.

Applied to the 25K intraday evaluation, the list price of $167.00 becomes $16.70. The five-pack drops from $749.50 to $74.95, or $14.99 each.

A 90% discount is not a discount. It is the price, with a larger number printed beside it for contrast, and the countdown is a design element. Compare Apex against other firms on the coupon price, because the coupon price is what everybody pays.

Two statements about legacy accounts, on one page

The help section says legacy accounts are “no longer available for new purchases.”

Roughly a screen further down, a promotional block reads: “Legacy Accounts Are Back For a Limited Time. Our Legacy Accounts evaluation accounts have returned across 6 balance tiers and 3 platforms. Available only while the promotion lasts,” with a link to buy them.

The likely explanation is ordinary: the help text was written in March and the promotion came later. The effect on a reader trying to work out which product they are buying, and which rule set governs it, is not ordinary. If you buy a legacy account, confirm in writing which rules apply to it, because the two product lines have different drawdown mechanics and different billing. Legacy accounts remain on recurring billing until cancelled. New ones do not.

What the firm claims about itself

“No payout denials. No payout reviews. No video reviews of trading. No chart screenshots needed.”

The middle three are meaningful and checkable against experience, because they describe a process the firm either runs or does not. Several competitors do require video review before releasing money, and its absence is a genuine difference.

“No payout denials” is the same unfalsifiable claim that sits on half the sites in this sector. A firm defines what a denial is, and an account closed for a consistency breach before a payout was requested is not a denied payout.

The rating on the page reads 4.2 from 21,000 reviews. That is a lower score than several smaller competitors, on a review count many times larger, which on balance is the more informative number of the two.

What we did not establish

Apex runs live compensation counters on its homepage. This review carries no payout total, because those figures are the company’s own and no third party attests to them. The review count and the country list are likewise self-published; if you are outside the US, open the restricted countries page and find your own country on it before you pay for anything.

Apex is not a regulated financial firm and does not claim to be. Selling simulated evaluations is not a regulated activity, so there is no register to check here, unlike firms that operate an affiliated broker.

Verdict: caution

Apex earns a better reading than most of its competitors on the thing that matters most in this sector, which is whether the rules can move under you. It ran a full product migration in March 2026 and put “no retroactive changes” in writing for existing customers. Payouts every five trading days with no review process and a 100% split are real advantages, and the rules are published in detail rather than buried.

The caution is for the gap between the bullet list and the specification. The consistency rule is gone from the evaluation and alive at 50% on the funded account. Payout requests are capped at six. The permanent 90% coupon means the advertised price is fiction. None of this is hidden, and all of it sits below the part of the page designed to make you buy.

Read the product table, not the banner.

Sources

Scored against the published methodology. Figures were accurate on 6 August 2026 and change frequently — confirm current terms with the provider. Not investment advice; see the risk disclaimer.