My Funded Futures review

Futures evaluation firm publishing an unusually full disclosure: 43.41% of participants reach the simulated funded stage, 28.56% of those are ever paid, and 1.01% reach live capital. The landing page says «Trade Firm Capital»; the footnote says demo.

Last verified 10 August 2026 · how we check

My Funded Futures sells futures evaluations. Pass the objectives, keep to the rules, and you trade a funded account with a profit split. The firm has grown fast since 2023 and says more than 100,000 traders have used it.

It also publishes more about its own outcomes than almost anyone in the industry, which makes it a rare case: most of what follows comes from the firm’s own website rather than from anything we had to work out.

What does the landing page claim, and what do the documents say?

The first thing to check on any evaluation firm is what kind of account you are buying. Here the two answers sit on the same site.

The superscript on «Trade Firm Capital» is doing a lot of work, and to the firm’s credit the footnote it leads to is unambiguous. Access to live capital comes “at our sole discretion” by invitation, through an affiliated company, after the simulated stage.

None of this is hidden and none of it is unusual for the sector. It is worth stating plainly because the words «funded» and «firm capital» carry a meaning in ordinary speech that the contract does not support.

How many people actually get paid?

The firm publishes a programme-wide summary covering 1 January 2024 to 1 July 2025:

Combining the middle two rows: about twelve participants in a hundred are ever paid anything, and one in a hundred reaches live capital.

Two things about the 43.41% deserve attention, and the firm states both. It counts people cumulatively “through participating in one or more evaluation programs”, and it “includes individuals who purchased multiple evaluation programs”. So it is a per-person rate across repeat purchases, not a per-attempt pass rate. The per-attempt figure would be lower and is not published.

We compare this against what other firms disclose in prop firm pass rates. Publishing this at all puts My Funded Futures ahead of most of the sector on transparency, whatever the numbers say.

What are the rules, and which of them decide the outcome?

As read on 10 August 2026, the firm advertises:

• Payout frequency — every 24 hours on the Rapid plan; the site describes on-demand withdrawal once thresholds are met, without a fixed weekly schedule
• Profit split — 90/10 on the Rapid plan, per the current banner
• Drawdown — end-of-day trailing on Rapid, and the calculation type is the main structural difference between plans
• No daily loss limits on Rapid and Pro funded accounts, and no consistency rule on Rapid

The drawdown calculation is the rule that decides most outcomes and the one to read before price. End-of-day trailing moves your loss limit up as your closing balance grows, and does not move it back down. Intraday trailing, used on other plans and by other firms, follows your unrealised peak instead, which is a materially harder constraint on the same strategy.

What we could not verify. The plan-by-plan drawdown figures, account sizes and fee schedule change with promotions; the site was running a 20% discount code when we read it. Take those numbers from the firm’s own plan page on the day you buy, not from any review including this one.

Which plan you buy decides which rules apply to you

The firm sells several plans, and the differences between them are not cosmetic. Reading a review that describes «the rules» without naming a plan will mislead you, because the drawdown treatment, the loss limits and the consistency requirement all move between tiers.

Four things separate the plans, and each is worth locating on the firm’s own plan page before paying:

How drawdown is calculated. End-of-day trailing measures against your closing balance; intraday trailing measures against your peak equity during the session. The same trade sequence can pass under one and fail under the other, and the difference is largest for anyone who lets positions run before taking profit.

Whether a daily loss limit applies. The firm advertises none on Rapid and Pro funded accounts. Where a daily limit exists it is a second, independent way to fail that has nothing to do with total drawdown.

Whether a consistency rule applies. Advertised as absent on Rapid. Consistency rules cap how much of your total profit any single day may represent, and they catch traders whose edge is concentrated in few large wins rather than spread evenly.

How often you can withdraw. Every 24 hours on Rapid, per the current site. Payout frequency is the rule most likely to change with a promotion, so confirm it on the day.

The pattern across all four is the same: the most permissive terms sit on the plan being promoted, and the promotion moves. Our page on prop firm challenges explains why the model needs these rules at all.

What is the company, and where?

The firm operates as an LLC and industry coverage places it in Dover, Delaware, founded November 2023. We have not independently confirmed the registration in a state register, so treat the entity details as reported rather than verified.

This matters more here than in a brokerage review, because a futures evaluation firm selling simulated accounts is not a regulated broker. There is no licence to look up, no segregated client money, and no compensation scheme. The firm is a counterparty selling a service, and your protection is the contract.

Regulatory context. Evaluation firms have been under increasing scrutiny: between 2024 and early 2026 roughly 80 to 100 firms closed, the CFTC consultation on challenge fees remains open, and enforcement has touched several operators. Our page on prop firm challenges sets out the timeline.

Verdict: caution

Not because of anything we found hidden, but because of what the firm itself publishes.

In its favour: the disclosure is fuller than the sector norm, the footnotes say what they should say, the payout mechanics are stated plainly, and the drawdown rules are documented rather than vague. A firm that publishes a 1.01% live-capital rate is not hiding the ball.

Against: the product is a simulated account with a non-refundable fee, roughly twelve participants in a hundred are ever paid, the firm is young in a sector where 80 to 100 competitors closed within two years, and there is no regulator, no segregation and no compensation scheme behind any of it.

Both halves come from the same source, which is the point.

Why we check this

We record what the firm publishes about itself with the date read, because promotional terms and plan rules change without notice, and because a disclosure block is the one part of a website written to be accurate rather than persuasive.

We do not run evaluations, hold funded accounts or trade with any firm on this site. Nothing here reports execution, slippage or payout speed from our own experience; where behaviour is described it is the firm’s published policy. Entity details are reported and not independently confirmed. See the methodology and the advertising disclosure for how the site is paid.

Sources

• MyFundedFutures — homepage and programme disclosures
• CFTC — Rule 4.41, hypothetical performance results